OpenClaw (first-party repo and docs)Verified

BL-CLM-44.

OpenClaw — Security controls: Gateway auth, DM pairing and allowlists, optional sandboxing (off by default) and an audit CLI; documented as a single-trusted-operator model, not a multi-tenant boundary.

Claim visualization

Actual claim data

BL-CLM-44 / Relationship

Claim evidence map

OpenClaw (first-party repo and docs)
OpenClaw — Security controls: Gateway auth, DM pairing and allowlists, optional sandboxing (off by default) and an audit CLI; documented as a single-trusted-operator model, not a multi-tenant boundary.

SECURITY.md states it is not a multi-tenant boundary and exec runs on host by default. SSO, RBAC and audit-log features were not found on pages read (not a statement they are absent). No certifications checked.

Where in the source
SECURITY.md: Trust model, Sandboxing, Named controls; docs.openclaw.ai/gateway/security
Source organization
OpenClaw (first-party repo and docs)
Evidence type
Vendor documentation
Source date
Not shown on the source
Last verified
October 13, 2026
Approved wording
According to OpenClaw (first-party repo and docs), gateway auth, DM pairing and allowlists, optional sandboxing (off by default) and an audit CLI; documented as a single-trusted-operator model, not a multi-tenant boundary.
Scope and caveats
SECURITY.md states it is not a multi-tenant boundary and exec runs on host by default. SSO, RBAC and audit-log features were not found on pages read (not a statement they are absent). No certifications checked.
Do not infer
Do not present documented controls as a certification, authorization or independent audit.
← All claimsRecord BL-CLM-44